Skip to main content

GROUP TUTORIAL - REFLECTION

The group tutorial was helpful in many ways, it allowed each individual artist an insight into the work they produce the materials they use and what interests they find fundamental to the production of their work. Those were the questions asked, what and how do you use materials? and What are the key interests that influence your practice?

From the discussion it became increasingly clear that each persons work is drastically different, when responding to the questions each person portrays a difference in theme and the materials they use. Speaking about my own work I explained and showed examples of the materials I use within my practice, which could be anything as long as it is or can be recycled. My work over summer has involved reclaiming wooden pallets and deconstructing them to create abstract sculptures that when placed within a landscape contrast the immediate area around the sculpture. I also used biodegradable tape within a landscape, wrapping the tape around the trees, as one of my colleagues said 

"by wrapping the tape horizontally around the trees it creates an interesting contrast between the vertical setting.."



Throughout the discussion it became very clear that my work is non-objective with no reference to figurative reality and that any ideology or concept behind the work could easily be missed. The concept behind my work in fact revolves around environmental issues which directly effect the landscapes that I use for my sculptures. Within my work I look at the detrimental effects that global warming, pollution and climate change  have on the world and our environments and how the 3 issues are all linked. How I choose to show this within my photography is by using recycled or materials that will not harm or effect the environment I place them in. The sculptures themselves convey direct contrasts between the physical glitch in reality placed in them and the surrounding areas.

To move forward with my practice after this discussion I feel I need to bridge the gap between my photography and the concept behind my practice, making it more understandable to the viewer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CORNELIA PARKER - THE STORY OF COLD DARK MATTER

Cold Dark Matter: An Exploded View  is the restored contents of a garden shed exploded by the British Army at the request of the artist Cornelia Parker. The surviving pieces have been used by Parker to create an installation suspended from the ceiling as if held mid-explosion. Lit by a single lightbulb the fragments cast dramatic shadows on the gallery’s walls.  In an interview with Tate curator Michaela Parkin, Parker suggested that an explosion was something she had wanted to do for a long time. To her, an explosion is an ‘archetypal’ image, familiar to us from childhood to adult life:       Somehow the idea and imminence of the ‘explosion’ in society seemed such an iconic thing. You were being constantly bombarded with its imagery, from the violence of the comic strip, through action films, in documentaries about Super Novas and the Big Bang, and least of all on the news in never ending reports of war. Parker liked the idea of something that happened...

CLAIRE BISHOP - COLLABORATIONS AND ITS DISCONTENTS

Claire Bishop’s short paper begins with a curious quote from Dan Graham: “All artists are alike. They dream of doing something that’s more social, more critical, and more real than art” (60) . A brazen comment, this generalisation gives Bishop’s discussion a provocative start. It also anticipates her assumption that all “real” art is necessarily concerned with aesthetics. This helps to explain her interest in discussing “the social turn” as Art—or, more accurately, a lack thereof . After briefly describing both the recent proliferation of publicly engaged art practices and their value as therapy for repairing the social bond , Bishop maps prevailing perceptions of this art as polarized. There are the “non-believers,” the aesthetes who dismiss the art as uninteresting, and there are “the believers” the zealots, the activists who, according to Bishop, “…reject aesthetic questions a s synonymous with the market and cultural hierarchy ” (61). Curiously, Bishop fails to identify a third ...

REFLECTION ON PUBLIC COLLABORATION !.

For this piece the initial artwork wasnt documented digitally by film or phtograph, i wanted to let the objects and the piece exist on their own within the space and allow the interactions and participation to happen without there being any sense that it is an art work. I feel like the results are completely different by just writing about the interactions as a reflection and a time lapse done in the simplest form by using text.  I found that the audience were rather confused about the obejcts as they were so precariously placed and people are used being informed about the art works or public art pieces. Knowing this the first investigation of this project was a success, i was able to gather an understanding of how people would interact with my art work and how it would display my concept.  After this investigation I do feel as though i need to reconsider how i document these installations, I still want them to be discrete and have a sense of the unknowing but also wo...