Skip to main content

9th OCTOBER TUTORIAL - REFLECTION

Throughout the tutorial we examined and picked apart what my current practise entails, the concept behind, the work being produced and how I could improve on these aspects going forward. Within my practise I am focusing on global environmental issues, immersing myself into the extensive debate surrounding climate change and anthropogenic global warming, trying to understand perspectives from scientists, politicians and environmentalist groups. As it stands it is understandably hard to get to grips with this ever changing and evolving topic. My research thus far has taken me full circle, looking at the causes and detrimental effects from angles which attack the subject from opposite sides, those who suggest that 'climate change may well be the biggest scam of modern times' and those who maintain that if we do not address this issue we are on track for mass global devastation. Also how 195 countries have come together to create a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming by 2 Degrees Celsius.

As I understand that this topic is so diverse and there is so much information it was taking its tole on the production of physical pieces as I was solely focused on researching and writing about my findings. It seemed like the best possible way to get back on track was to come away from global issues and concentrate on areas in which I display my work, looking at how they are particularly effected by climate change creating a direct link between my physical work and and my concept.

I also thought about how my work could be presented within an environment - |I mainly want to focus on creating sculptures that have a direct link with that environment i.e. using wood taken from a forest, creating a sculpture and then placing it back into the environment with a message about the effects of climate change on that area. Bigert and Bergstrom have explored different aspect of  nature and climate change within their art, one work that particularly resonates with mine is their performance on top of Swedens highest peak 'The Freeze' in 2016. Using themselves within the environment to directly explore a human relationship with nature. 

Other artists mentioned within the tutorial are Sven Sachsalber and Bas-jan Alber who use performance within their works to portray a message. This style of creating and using myself within my work has interested me, I thought about how I could incorporate myself within an environment in conjunction with the materials I use. This would create and show direct human interaction within the immediate environment, further exploring the  relationship between social and scientific theory and sustainability, seeking to construct a broader view of humanity's relationship with nature and how we are ultimately shaping and changing the world that we live in.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CORNELIA PARKER - THE STORY OF COLD DARK MATTER

Cold Dark Matter: An Exploded View  is the restored contents of a garden shed exploded by the British Army at the request of the artist Cornelia Parker. The surviving pieces have been used by Parker to create an installation suspended from the ceiling as if held mid-explosion. Lit by a single lightbulb the fragments cast dramatic shadows on the gallery’s walls.  In an interview with Tate curator Michaela Parkin, Parker suggested that an explosion was something she had wanted to do for a long time. To her, an explosion is an ‘archetypal’ image, familiar to us from childhood to adult life:       Somehow the idea and imminence of the ‘explosion’ in society seemed such an iconic thing. You were being constantly bombarded with its imagery, from the violence of the comic strip, through action films, in documentaries about Super Novas and the Big Bang, and least of all on the news in never ending reports of war. Parker liked the idea of something that happened...

CLAIRE BISHOP - COLLABORATIONS AND ITS DISCONTENTS

Claire Bishop’s short paper begins with a curious quote from Dan Graham: “All artists are alike. They dream of doing something that’s more social, more critical, and more real than art” (60) . A brazen comment, this generalisation gives Bishop’s discussion a provocative start. It also anticipates her assumption that all “real” art is necessarily concerned with aesthetics. This helps to explain her interest in discussing “the social turn” as Art—or, more accurately, a lack thereof . After briefly describing both the recent proliferation of publicly engaged art practices and their value as therapy for repairing the social bond , Bishop maps prevailing perceptions of this art as polarized. There are the “non-believers,” the aesthetes who dismiss the art as uninteresting, and there are “the believers” the zealots, the activists who, according to Bishop, “…reject aesthetic questions a s synonymous with the market and cultural hierarchy ” (61). Curiously, Bishop fails to identify a third ...

REFLECTION ON PUBLIC COLLABORATION !.

For this piece the initial artwork wasnt documented digitally by film or phtograph, i wanted to let the objects and the piece exist on their own within the space and allow the interactions and participation to happen without there being any sense that it is an art work. I feel like the results are completely different by just writing about the interactions as a reflection and a time lapse done in the simplest form by using text.  I found that the audience were rather confused about the obejcts as they were so precariously placed and people are used being informed about the art works or public art pieces. Knowing this the first investigation of this project was a success, i was able to gather an understanding of how people would interact with my art work and how it would display my concept.  After this investigation I do feel as though i need to reconsider how i document these installations, I still want them to be discrete and have a sense of the unknowing but also wo...