Skip to main content

KICKSTART PROJECT - REFLECTION

" This year you will be increasingly focusing on your own autonomous direction for your practice whilst also developing co-operative and collaborative working processes. This one week project encourages you to work with your studio colleagues and start to become familiar with the studio space that you share. The project encourages you to ask 3 questions: What might I (or we) make here?"

The project is broadly split into 2 phases, the first stage is for us to become familiar with the location, the studio itself and our colleagues within the studio space. The second phase is to make work in relation to the intentions of each individual within the space. 

To become familiar with my surroundings I first wanted to find out the definition for the term 'space' to give myself a clearer idea as how to approach  the question 'Who am I?' and 'Who are they?'

"the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move."

 As the people occupying the space we are in term all things that exist and move with that space. I monitored each persons movements and how they all react to their own personal section of that space and the surrounding areas. I then listened and documented the communication and interaction between the group. After this I spoke to each individual to create an understanding as to how they plan to interpret the space and what sort of ideas they have to utilise it.

'What might I do here?'
For this phase of the brief it seemed necessary to collaborate with each others practices to develop an intimate understanding. I created an idea which combined the materials I use within my practise and each individual within the space. A corroborative sculpture project in which my colleagues control the development of the sculpture with the materials I provided. The goal was to create a sculpture in response to the space, the materials and each persons individual artist perspective creating a physical conversation between myself, the studio space; materials and my colleagues but simply through an act.





Aside from my own studio project we each explored each others thought processes and materials used within our practises, developing an understanding of the fundamental and influential elements within our works. To do this we experimented by creating our own piece within a project set by each individual. The end result is a collaborative piece intertwining each occupant in the studio space.

Oliver's idea was to record human existence within the studio space by painting the hands, feet and recording the height of each person in the studio and displaying the findings within each individuals personal space. Through this he achieved visable interaction between everyone in the space, creating an 'existence' within the space itself. 



Hannah wanted to use string to wrap around everyday objects that we may come across in the studio space. Creating sculptures that had a practical, functional use and making them impractical, taking away any form or power from that particular object. She was massively influenced by artist Judith Scott who uses fibres such as string to wrap around objects in multiple layers. The fibres and the object then combine creating abstract forms.



Laura is interested in the psychological changes and impacts that people go through. She visually documented the ever merging interaction and communication between the group using visual-psych and developed a small scale investigation into how we are fundamentally similar with many differences and how we will all impact each other as the year progresses. Using these recordings she developed a task which saw us each writing a line focusing on our own practises and what we find fundamental within it including and main influences. In term this created a poem linking each person in the space but also showing our hugely different approaches and views. 

Through researching for this project I found that there are huge similarities between how we as a group approached this and 'The other Fab Four: Collaoboration and Neo-Dada' a plan for an exhibition by J.D. Welch. Our group projects combine a range of art forms coming together to produce a series of performance art works documented through each other.

Fostered by the revolutionary spirit of institutions like Black Mountain College, a minority artmaking movement working against the Modernist/Abstract Expressionist style and theoretical framework appeared in the early fifties, eventually giving way to what we now term Pop. Referred to as ”neo-Dada,” many artists of this transitory period/style  resurrected the Dada traditions of the readymade and composition by chance operations (among others) and used alternative materials and formal constructions to make their art– from paintings and sculpture to performance, music and dance.

The looseness of the organisation and disparate practices make it hard to categorise the movement either by its temporal period or by shared elements of style. The only universal trait of neo-Dada is its free-form and disparate nature. In this exhibition the years from the end of Abstract Expressionism to Pop are considered in the context of the movement’s appropriation of the historical avant-garde sensibility coupled with radical innovation into sophisticated performance-based works.

Instead of a general survey of the movement, however, the focus here is on the collaborative aspect of the artforms, making specific example of a small group of collaborative performances that arose from the collective work of painters Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg, composer John Cage, and choreographer and dancer Merce Cunningham.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CORNELIA PARKER - THE STORY OF COLD DARK MATTER

Cold Dark Matter: An Exploded View  is the restored contents of a garden shed exploded by the British Army at the request of the artist Cornelia Parker. The surviving pieces have been used by Parker to create an installation suspended from the ceiling as if held mid-explosion. Lit by a single lightbulb the fragments cast dramatic shadows on the gallery’s walls.  In an interview with Tate curator Michaela Parkin, Parker suggested that an explosion was something she had wanted to do for a long time. To her, an explosion is an ‘archetypal’ image, familiar to us from childhood to adult life:       Somehow the idea and imminence of the ‘explosion’ in society seemed such an iconic thing. You were being constantly bombarded with its imagery, from the violence of the comic strip, through action films, in documentaries about Super Novas and the Big Bang, and least of all on the news in never ending reports of war. Parker liked the idea of something that happened...

CLAIRE BISHOP - COLLABORATIONS AND ITS DISCONTENTS

Claire Bishop’s short paper begins with a curious quote from Dan Graham: “All artists are alike. They dream of doing something that’s more social, more critical, and more real than art” (60) . A brazen comment, this generalisation gives Bishop’s discussion a provocative start. It also anticipates her assumption that all “real” art is necessarily concerned with aesthetics. This helps to explain her interest in discussing “the social turn” as Art—or, more accurately, a lack thereof . After briefly describing both the recent proliferation of publicly engaged art practices and their value as therapy for repairing the social bond , Bishop maps prevailing perceptions of this art as polarized. There are the “non-believers,” the aesthetes who dismiss the art as uninteresting, and there are “the believers” the zealots, the activists who, according to Bishop, “…reject aesthetic questions a s synonymous with the market and cultural hierarchy ” (61). Curiously, Bishop fails to identify a third ...

REFLECTION ON PUBLIC COLLABORATION !.

For this piece the initial artwork wasnt documented digitally by film or phtograph, i wanted to let the objects and the piece exist on their own within the space and allow the interactions and participation to happen without there being any sense that it is an art work. I feel like the results are completely different by just writing about the interactions as a reflection and a time lapse done in the simplest form by using text.  I found that the audience were rather confused about the obejcts as they were so precariously placed and people are used being informed about the art works or public art pieces. Knowing this the first investigation of this project was a success, i was able to gather an understanding of how people would interact with my art work and how it would display my concept.  After this investigation I do feel as though i need to reconsider how i document these installations, I still want them to be discrete and have a sense of the unknowing but also wo...