Skip to main content

COLLABORATION PROJECTS REFLECTIONS

'The Wall'

This cross course collaboration bore some interesting results as far as the means of collaborating with a subject that can sometimes feel so distant to fine art, the concept and ideology behind the piece of work was quite hard to express at first as the graphics students were thinking in a rather literal sense rather than delving a little deeper into the thought process. Expelling this their literal approach to the project brought my level of conceptual thinking to a rather rational level, which allowed me to concentrate on the actual creation and practicality of the project rather than the meaning in that time. The collaboration offered an insight into how two like-mind thinkers in the sense of social and environmental views can think so alternate in terms of practise and work process. 

The project itself is just the start of a concept i want to take further and eventually make it into  community event in which people from all walks of life whether they share the same views or are just lovers of art take part in a large scale clean up on the beach. the cleanup would entail collecting all the man made materials across the whole beach and creating one large scale intervention on the site that would act as a great reminder of how much waste these people have been ignoring for years. The intervention would eventually be reclaimed by nature but before hand the sculpture would evoke this great message of what needs to be done to ensure we are doing all that we can for the natural world.

The images taken on the day of the project portray the nature of how we tried to manage the practicalities of creating the wall with some images bearing reminder that we are indeed not just artists but human too, so by leaving in the selfless, candid images it bears reminder that not only someone who thinks in an artistic socially positive way can produce and help.

'Glitches'

Using the public and the public realm to comprise a collaborative project is a bit of a risk as it takes away the literal definition of the word but still in turn acts as a collaborative public art piece. This project hasnt been documented or even wrote about as much as i have planned, to me it lives on through the concept and can act as an art piece alone as i ask people to think about the non-everyday within their everyday, proposing a question of how we can look at the world differently and find these glitches that occupy our reality. By doing this it will create thousands of alternate realities for each individual so there can never really be one set aspect to document. This is something i have thought extensively about and is something i want to develop as i am yet to fully understand my own concept and theory let alone ask anyone else to comprehend it fully. The question i am asking myself is what physical things can i create which will have the same effect as to what i am proposing the audience or participators do with their mind.

As the hallowed institutions make viewing art a luxury to much of the modern western world as well as the freedom to make and express the artists views and conceptual reins, what happens when we take away this institutional grip and enter into the reality that is the everyday. Fragments and harsh realities can be portrayed through the artist and their work but when it is situated within a gallery space surrounded by like-minded thinkers does it have the same impact as opposed to when placed within the public realm. Public art is a reflection of how we see the world, the artists response to our time and space running parallel to the audiences every day. When art is placed within a public space it combines the artists vision and views with our own sense of who we are relieving the constraints of corporate power and hierarchy. We search to create something more socially positive, something more critical and something more real than art. The question is can this be achieved by unlocking the constraints of institutions and allowing the art to live and breathe within a space that feels more natural, more accessible and in which it belongs within the community for everyone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CORNELIA PARKER - THE STORY OF COLD DARK MATTER

Cold Dark Matter: An Exploded View  is the restored contents of a garden shed exploded by the British Army at the request of the artist Cornelia Parker. The surviving pieces have been used by Parker to create an installation suspended from the ceiling as if held mid-explosion. Lit by a single lightbulb the fragments cast dramatic shadows on the gallery’s walls.  In an interview with Tate curator Michaela Parkin, Parker suggested that an explosion was something she had wanted to do for a long time. To her, an explosion is an ‘archetypal’ image, familiar to us from childhood to adult life:       Somehow the idea and imminence of the ‘explosion’ in society seemed such an iconic thing. You were being constantly bombarded with its imagery, from the violence of the comic strip, through action films, in documentaries about Super Novas and the Big Bang, and least of all on the news in never ending reports of war. Parker liked the idea of something that happened...

CLAIRE BISHOP - COLLABORATIONS AND ITS DISCONTENTS

Claire Bishop’s short paper begins with a curious quote from Dan Graham: “All artists are alike. They dream of doing something that’s more social, more critical, and more real than art” (60) . A brazen comment, this generalisation gives Bishop’s discussion a provocative start. It also anticipates her assumption that all “real” art is necessarily concerned with aesthetics. This helps to explain her interest in discussing “the social turn” as Art—or, more accurately, a lack thereof . After briefly describing both the recent proliferation of publicly engaged art practices and their value as therapy for repairing the social bond , Bishop maps prevailing perceptions of this art as polarized. There are the “non-believers,” the aesthetes who dismiss the art as uninteresting, and there are “the believers” the zealots, the activists who, according to Bishop, “…reject aesthetic questions a s synonymous with the market and cultural hierarchy ” (61). Curiously, Bishop fails to identify a third ...

REFLECTION ON PUBLIC COLLABORATION !.

For this piece the initial artwork wasnt documented digitally by film or phtograph, i wanted to let the objects and the piece exist on their own within the space and allow the interactions and participation to happen without there being any sense that it is an art work. I feel like the results are completely different by just writing about the interactions as a reflection and a time lapse done in the simplest form by using text.  I found that the audience were rather confused about the obejcts as they were so precariously placed and people are used being informed about the art works or public art pieces. Knowing this the first investigation of this project was a success, i was able to gather an understanding of how people would interact with my art work and how it would display my concept.  After this investigation I do feel as though i need to reconsider how i document these installations, I still want them to be discrete and have a sense of the unknowing but also wo...